Make your own free website on Tripod.com

This excellent research is included in the IFO Database with permission from 

 Eltjo H. Haselhoff, Ph.D.

You may view this article at: http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/Dutch/LightOrbsSenseandNonsense.html

Check out Dr. Haselhoff's new book:

The Deepening Complexity Of Crop Circles

Scientific Research & Urban Legends

at

http://www.dcocc.com

Thank you, Dr. Haselhoff !!


Crop Circles and Light Orbs

Sense and Nonsense  

 Eltjo H. Haselhoff, Ph.D.


Ever since crop circles have appeared, anomalous light effects, allegedly related to the crop circle phenomenon, have been reported by many eye witnesses. The vast number of accounts, plus an abundant amount of photographic and in particular video material seem to proof the existence of crop-circle related ‘Balls of Light’, known as BOLs, sometimes simply referred to as light orbs, or - for reasons unclear to the author - plasma balls.

Particularly during the last few years, with the increasing awareness of these anomalous light phenomena, many self-proclaimed crop circle researchers have published a wealth of photographs of these plasma balls in newspapers, books, magazines, and of course on the Internet.

A number of reported characteristics of these light orbs are:

An example of these plasma balls can be seen in the photograph below.

Crop circle with ‘plasma balls’

Zooming in to one of these spheres, one recognises the intricate details as well as the rim:

‘Plasma Ball’, close up

Needless to say, the ‘plasma balls’ also appear on the photographic negative, and even on pictures taken with a digital camera, excluding faults in chemical processing.


The examples shown here, however, and without any doubt the majority of ‘plasma balls’ photographed and published by others, are another nice example of What You Seek Is What You Get. When a flash photograph is taken in the pitch dark, the camera will produce the brightest flash the hardware permits, as can be usually seen by the over-illuminated foreground. Due to the limited range of the flash, however, large parts of the photograph will nevertheless remain dark. Consequently, any tiny little speck of dust or anything similar floating in the air within reach of the camera flash, will produce a relatively bright reflection. Dust particles far away from the camera will not be captured, however, those at shorter distances will appear as large smears of light (because they will be out of focus), the shape of which will depend on their exact distance from the camera and the optical system of the camera itself. They might take the shape of the camera’s diaphragm (circular, hexagonal, diamond-shaped, square), although they will typically appear as circular spots. The curious nomenclature ‘plasma ball’ should therefore be replaced by UFO instead, in this context meaning un-focused object, since these so-called anomalies can be easily explained.

By no means does the author intend to dismiss off all reported light phenomena related to crop circles. However, an investigation into their origin takes more than a simple photo camera and a flash. The least one should do is:

Photographs taken in a different way can never be conclusive. Some examples are given below. The first one is a flash photograph of my 3 year old daughter, on last New Years Eve. The ball artifacts are induced by extremely small smoke particles, caused by the fireworks. The second photograph was taken with a flash while there was heavy snowfall. It can be clearly seen how the small snowflakes, as they approach the camera, get out of focus and transform into spherical ‘plasma balls’, including the delicate details (possibly an interference effect) and the rim.

Ball artifacts induced by camera flash and smoke particles

Ball artifacts induced by camera flash and small snow flakes

The reason I decided to write this article is not primarily to falsify premature conclusions made by others, although this is common in the scientific world, and is a prerequisite for scientific progress. But there is a more important reason. Ill-founded articles and premature or inaccurate conclusions made by those with apparently no profound knowledge of the equipment they use (in this case optical lens systems), cast a dark shadow on the crop circle phenomenon in general, which is already under fire by lots of (often undeserved) skepticism. I am convinced that there is a genuine and highly interesting mechanism behind a considerable part of the crop circle phenomenon, and serious researchers have collected enough evidence to convince anyone who has just some common sense. Getting this message out, however, is extremely difficult, and ill-founded, erroneous articles will seriously reduce the chance that crop circles will one day get the public attention they deserve. Of course this does not mean that crop circle research should be performed by a limited number of elite-groups only. It just means that anyone should always be aware of those things he or she does not know enough about, before jumping to conclusions.


© copyright E. H. Haselhoff, Ph.D. All rights reserved.